Do you like this forum subject?

You can post in here ideas and comments on how you think we could improve things on undernet.
User avatar
Stefano
Posts: 40
Location: Larnaca, Cyprus

Do you like this forum subject?

Post by Stefano »

Do you like the "How can we improve Undernet" forum? Are the topics created until now satisfying you? Do you get the answers you need when you create a new topic? We will be glad to hear your critic. Suggestions allowed =)
Stefano Sordini

OUTsider
Posts: 435
Location: Netherlands

Post by OUTsider »

the question ain't if we like it.. the question is more like: does it make sense.
Thats my opinion....
Don't bother reading, I'm just the lame botlender, right ?

User avatar
ender
Posts: 5
Location: .ro

Post by ender »

it does make sense to me since you can always find new ideas on how to improve undernet and this is a good place to post them :wink: .



-

User avatar
\cpt\
Posts: 41

Post by \cpt\ »

\cpt wrote:
OUTsider wrote:the question ain't if we like it.. the question is more like: does it make sense.

Stefano as i said.. why we must have 2 places where to post comments, ideas, etc.... about undernet?
Do you think the comments, ideas, suggestions will be readed faster if they are posted here and not in the other forum: "Undernet feedback"?
Or... the posts in there will be readed faster if they are posted here?
I see one of the forums useless.
captain me.

User avatar
Razvanet
Posts: 406
Location: Toronto,Canada

Post by Razvanet »

In my opinion both forums are good even if they are similar...as all of you can see most topics found in this 2 forums are a bit different... :)
Dream what you want to dream; go where you want to go; be what you want to be because you have only one life and one chance to do all the things you want in life.

OUTsider
Posts: 435
Location: Netherlands

Post by OUTsider »

Let me rephrase, we are just a bunch of users, in the past years I've been on undernet there where hardly any idea's from users, no matter how good there where being accepted.
Undernet is afraid of changing.

Look at the ircu code for example. Nothing against the coders, honestly.. but ircu is like the only ircd code remaining that doesn't support ipv6 while all other mayor ircd's do. Undernet is afraid of seeing the massive amounts of /64's or /48's heading towards there networks

Then let's look at Channel Services. They have something against other bots, they fight botlenders, suspend there userid's deny users to give there bots a userid, but they DO use one or two bots themself, equip it with a userid and see the need to do so. They force others to stick to the rules they break on there own.
Don't bother reading, I'm just the lame botlender, right ?

User avatar
Razvanet
Posts: 406
Location: Toronto,Canada

Post by Razvanet »

I agree, if Undernet will change i think it will be a miracole...not to mention CService...they are "classy" :-?
Dream what you want to dream; go where you want to go; be what you want to be because you have only one life and one chance to do all the things you want in life.

User avatar
simba
Posts: 209
Location: UK, Cambridge

Post by simba »

IMHO,

Cservice need to make it easier for people to register channels.

Its very hard for some people to find 10 people with usernames and then wait the long period of time for the chan to be regged.

If it was easier to reg chans , then people wouldnt need to resort to eggdrops bots , channels wouldnt get taken over as often, IRCops would have an easier life, and we all live happy ever after.
Image

User avatar
\cpt\
Posts: 41

Post by \cpt\ »

Very true...
captain me.

User avatar
evi|one
Posts: 211
Location: Netherlands

Post by evi|one »

simba wrote:[...]IRCops would have an easier life, and we all live happy ever after[...]


Yeah. The question is: does CService want IRCops to have an easier life? ;)
I am a signature virus. Copy me into your signature to help me spread.

User avatar
Boogie
Posts: 46
Location: Bacau / Romania

Post by Boogie »

:))) it ain`t easy
"E.C.S.T.A.S.Y. Why? Cause I like to get high." (Rob Gee)

OUTsider
Posts: 435
Location: Netherlands

Post by OUTsider »

simba wrote:then people wouldnt need to resort to eggdrops bots.

Eggdrops will always be usefull, but they wouldn't be needed as channelkeepers, they would be usable against floods. Always remember, X is deaf in channels, thus ppl will always resort to eggies to coup with the sideeffects of a deaf service.

However, making it easier to register also brings some other backdraws along, X consumes resources, way more then the average clientserver. It has to keep an eye on all channels. Monitor joins/parts/modes in all channels etc.
Don't bother reading, I'm just the lame botlender, right ?

User avatar
Stefano
Posts: 40
Location: Larnaca, Cyprus

Post by Stefano »

[quote="simba"]IMHO,

Cservice need to make it easier for people to register channels.

Its very hard for some people to find 10 people with usernames and then wait the long period of time for the chan to be regged.quote]

In the topic i have created with subject: Undernet Services , when i said that CService should make it easier the chan. registration, most of users replied were negative to that.

http://www.undernet.org/forum/viewtopic ... 3&start=15
Stefano Sordini

User avatar
Boogie
Posts: 46
Location: Bacau / Romania

Post by Boogie »

its hard 2 find 10 good users these daYz ...
"E.C.S.T.A.S.Y. Why? Cause I like to get high." (Rob Gee)

User avatar
K8oard
Posts: 56
Location: UK, London

Post by K8oard »

Yes Stafano, I believe 100% that this Forum topic is very good, cause our loving network Undernet needs something like that, even critics and sugesstions, cause "if there are no critics, the whole World will be a simple emptyness" and I also pressume that out there are a lot of users willing to improve Undernet somehow even if it`s just a word, the "The Earth was made after words of God" so that means word = action if the words are good said...
Muzik,...It`s my life...!!!
Image