Dear (ab)users, Lemme make a simple statement: stop wasting my mailbox with useless removal requests because your chinese/taiwanese/wherever hacked cable/router/shellserver is listed. I check every request by hand, and if you try to use fake emails, or I know for like 99% sure that box is compromize...

if that doesn't work:
you should get a reply stating where libpq-fe.h is located in, maybe you need to sudo updatedb first.

then open db/pgsqlDB.cc and db/pgsqlDB.h, and change the #include "libpq-fe.h" to include the full path to it.

You folks really kinda force me to make a reply here, so here it comes. First of all, +N (no channel notice allowed), yes it's true that this mode *would* block ctcp replies, but only ctcp replies TARGETTED TO THE CHANNEL. Whenever you send out a CTCP to a channel, you would still get replies since ...

Ok, first of all, I totally agree with the fact that undernet should do something about the drones, second, xplora, yes I know AE is *trying* to do a 'good' job in solving the issue by attempting to eliminate the origin of the problem, the ones establishing the botnet. But you *HAVE* to agree with t...

uhm, xplora, to reply on your first post regarding the usage of silence instead of the what you all call 'obsolete' +R.
Your solution will only work on people that are set +x. Not everyone is, so people that are not using +x, but are registered, will also be ignored.

From what I know the following happened during the big cleanup: Around 30+ opers have been removed after the netmanagment decided that opers that are either idle or known to be attracting ddos attacks against servers should be purged. Some of these have been readopted by other admins, others showed ...

trmade98 wrote:Is that channel closed?

If not, then you have to ask yourself... could all of my energy aruging been better put toward doing a channel close?

-trmade98

dude, whats the purpose of closing a chan ?
They will simply create a new one. So closing a chan is USELESS !

/me counts... hmmm that makes me number 4 , doesn't it ?

Ok, many thanks to sjs to finally push that box back into it's rack after spending your remaining free time to reinstall it

aimbot ? yeach !

I complained about mIRC being commercial crap too. Go figure

Yeah, it must have been a shok for you seeing undernet becoming like this in those 6 years. A lot has changed, and believe me, if certain persons on this network don't change their attitude, it's only going to get worse. These days admins hide behind a stubborn and useless policy which they think wi...

Wanna know a solution to prevent takeovers in registered channels ? (Having a registered channel getting taken over is stupid on itself though) - STOP GIVING OUT LEVEL 499 ACCESSES LIKE CANDY - START THINKING ABOUT WHO YOU EVEN GIVE ACCESS - STOP OPPING EVERYONE FOR FUN. - AND STOP SHARING YOUR PASS...

How about the opername ?

why check for X on all channels when X has all registered channel stored in its dbase? all the servers got to do is access that list and paste it into the users dialog box. First of all, for security reasons, ircu will NOT connect to the database. Second, adding support to even do this would requir...

Doing that would cost a tremendous amount of resources, since the code would need to check every channel for the presence of a service before adding it to a list. And having an ircu server loop through 100k of channels every time someone does a /list and checking through all the members in that chan...