Search found 28 matches
- Tue Apr 19, 2005 4:42 pm
- Forum: General posts
- Topic: 04/18/2005 .. Massive gline ?!
- Replies: 31
- Views: 48308
- Sat Apr 16, 2005 9:36 pm
- Forum: How can we improve undernet?
- Topic: Increase Maxbans in channels..
- Replies: 29
- Views: 52924
http://forum.undernet.org/images/smiles/classic.gif Here is a example.. [21:59:11] * Carmelita (~lwalb@160.170-78-194.adsl-fix.skynet.be) has joined #moldova [21:59:11] * X sets mode: +b *!*@160.170-78-194.adsl-fix.skynet.be [21:59:11] * Carmelita was kicked by X ((Capcaun) REALNAME-ul care il ai e...
- Sat Apr 16, 2005 8:03 am
- Forum: How can we improve undernet?
- Topic: Increase Maxbans in channels..
- Replies: 29
- Views: 52924
In some topic Homer wrote.. X banlist can go up to 300bans, X will force the maxbans and if i`m not wrong also you`ll be able to set those 45 bans by regular users (maximun 345) I think this is great idea! To make X bans do not counted(for MAXBANS)! So, for example, if X even set 50 active bans on t...
- Fri Apr 15, 2005 10:13 pm
- Forum: How can we improve undernet?
- Topic: Increase Maxbans in channels..
- Replies: 29
- Views: 52924
Increase Maxbans in channels..
These days a new annoying drone appear.. It have a timer what rejoin each 1200 secs(20 mins).. It being really hard to keep these drones away of our channel.. Lots of bans..Unbans.. Normal chat on the channel is nearly impossible, users are frustrated.. Can you please increase maxbans on the channel...
- Sat Feb 05, 2005 7:31 am
- Forum: Ideas and Questions
- Topic: CPRIVMSG&CNOTICE is allowed to be used by voiced users!?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 7274
CPRIVMSG&CNOTICE is allowed to be used by voiced users!?
I think that is not good what voicers have access to that cmd, it is not used so often, and often users abused of its feature(on many channels +m&+v is used as channel protection).
I think is better to allow that cmd only to +o users. Because at +v it creates many problems..
I think is better to allow that cmd only to +o users. Because at +v it creates many problems..
- Sat Jan 08, 2005 8:16 pm
- Forum: Ideas and Questions
- Topic: Bug Report about bans through X
- Replies: 10
- Views: 18197
Hope that bug will be fixed soon, today i haved same probs.. [21:57:24] * yonicogiosuf (~ircap751@200.Red-213-96-253.pooles.rima-tde.net) has joined #moldova [21:57:24] * yonicogiosuf was kicked by X ((Storming) Prea Mult Spamm de pe acest IP) [21:57:25] * yonicogiosuf (~ircap751@200.Red-213-96-253....
- Fri Dec 03, 2004 1:06 pm
- Forum: How can we improve undernet?
- Topic: //msg x set $chan Xlog on/off
- Replies: 8
- Views: 13840
- Fri Nov 19, 2004 2:05 pm
- Forum: How can we improve undernet?
- Topic: Ban on raw events ?
- Replies: 8
- Views: 16369
- Thu Jul 29, 2004 12:36 pm
- Forum: How can we improve undernet?
- Topic: New join/part spam
- Replies: 6
- Views: 13632
- Fri Jul 23, 2004 10:05 am
- Forum: General posts
- Topic: norske jo ;)
- Replies: 2
- Views: 6693
Solar, almost users from that forum don't know your language, so if you really whant some body help you, you must write in english.. Or at least in french(preferably the first one).. Or if you don't know these languages try to find a help channel what support your language. Yah.. I just try to trans...
- Thu Jul 22, 2004 8:44 pm
- Forum: How can we improve undernet?
- Topic: New join/part spam
- Replies: 6
- Views: 13632
- Thu Jul 22, 2004 8:34 pm
- Forum: How can we improve undernet?
- Topic: How can we stop takeovers?
- Replies: 54
- Views: 67848
I talk about takeover through X bot(x ban # *!*@*) and i don't see how strictop||massdeoppro can help a owner&master of a channel to avoid these incidents(if that happen, at least unban the bad ban without removing other). And i don't think what is soo hard to write code what will make that possbile...
- Thu Jul 22, 2004 11:39 am
- Forum: How can we improve undernet?
- Topic: How can we stop takeovers?
- Replies: 54
- Views: 67848
Last week a was see a take on the #Romania channel :) That was just a mistake of a operator.. Was funny to see how ~1000 users just fly out with a funny reson.. ;) Huge of trafic&time was loosing in set of the x bans.. I still think what the current version&features of X bot is not perfect(unfortuna...
- Tue Jun 15, 2004 11:27 am
- Forum: Ideas and Questions
- Topic: Login to X ussing only hash of pass not the real pass
- Replies: 2
- Views: 7178
..and lotsa brute force.. Anyway, 50% of lamers will not know how to crack that or just will not have enogh time&resources to brute-force a 9 lengthed pass. You would need to store it in encrypted form. To DESencrypt somethink need a key(smth..), so that is useless because the key must be in that s...
- Tue Jun 15, 2004 9:49 am
- Forum: Ideas and Questions
- Topic: Login to X ussing only hash of pass not the real pass
- Replies: 2
- Views: 7178
Login to X ussing only hash of pass not the real pass
That feature will save more the user password from lamers what use sniffing (at least they will not know the real pass, and will can't login to the web interface to change it), and will make possible to put autologin script ex. into de psybnc scripts without so big fear what someone can hack the she...