Search found 6 matches
- Sat Apr 03, 2004 10:24 am
- Forum: Ideas and Questions
- Topic: Bug Report about bans through X
- Replies: 10
- Views: 18276
- Mon Mar 22, 2004 9:52 pm
- Forum: Website Feedback
- Topic: webchat - simple note
- Replies: 18
- Views: 28874
- Sat Mar 20, 2004 11:02 pm
- Forum: Website Feedback
- Topic: webchat - simple note
- Replies: 18
- Views: 28874
- Wed Mar 10, 2004 9:07 am
- Forum: Ideas and Questions
- Topic: Bug Report about bans through X
- Replies: 10
- Views: 18276
Hi again, I have just managed to reproduce it, here goes the logs: /msg X BAN #Zurna *!*@159.* 336 100 bot * X sets mode: +b *!*@159.* * BERNA28 was kicked by X ((zfrymn) bot) * BERNA28 (~user@159.Red-81-33-111.pooles.rima-tde.net) has joined #Zurna * BERNA28 was kicked by X ((zfrymn) bot) * BERNA28...
- Wed Mar 10, 2004 8:50 am
- Forum: Ideas and Questions
- Topic: Bug Report about bans through X
- Replies: 10
- Views: 18276
Yeah, I agree it should cover but it doesn't. It happens when the first character after the @ in the banmask is a number and the last one is the wildcard * . Such banmasks apply only to unresolved IP addresses, not to resolved hostnames even if the mask matches the hostname. But X doesn't think that...
- Sat Mar 06, 2004 6:23 am
- Forum: Ideas and Questions
- Topic: Bug Report about bans through X
- Replies: 10
- Views: 18276
Bug Report about bans through X
Hi all. Here are the instructions to reproduce this bug: 1. Set a ban like this: *!*@152.* through X. 2. Wait for a user who has a resolved hostname that matches the banmask to join the channel. (for example: 152.Red-80-24-158.pooles.rima-tde.net) According to the ircu, the user is not banned and ca...