since the server admins have such freedom to not implement the new mode the undernet commite has approved, they should inform about it. i agree that the webmaster got better things to do than check the version of every server. but if the server admins had handed him the info it would't take him long...

That's why i wan't to have a more detailed list on the server list site. what modes they support and what version of ircu they are using. i'm not looking for ways to check if a server supports +D mode on irc. i'm looking for a list so you don't have to join every undernet server to check if they do ...

I asked in #coder-com if there is any servers left that is not supporting the +D channel mode. In return i got the answear "check the version". I asked "Is it listet somewhere or do i got to connect to every server and run a version check?" the channel went dead. Now why can't Un...

i see #usernames as a channel i have to go to when i got a problem #CService can't fix. like suspended username forgotten password and secret answear where you need an admin to get you to send a mail so he can "verify" that your the real owner even doh your still logged in to the suspende...

Dooku said: Why ? because they are smarter, they can do what ever they want with the source/code/etc... + the i don't know whats all the fuss about ... as chaters we should ... CHAT, let them do theyr jobs so we could do ours. there's a diffrence between knowing a thing others don't know and being s...

i always remember..
... when undernet was stable
... when you diden't get flooded every week
... when over 50% of undernet was real ppl and not abusive bots

In regards to flooders, g-lines solve nothing they do not really stop the attack, they barely even stall it, g-lines expire, just like X bans, training and management is better, as well as reporting hacked hosts commonly used by floodes to abuse-exploits@undernet.org since they attempt to report th...

point is.. they should be following their own rules.. and as Eenie said.. i used Quakenet as an example that maxlogins can work fine on a network.. MartYanu said: there the opers own drones, ddoses users, and more than that, Quakenet is the most lame network I ever seen, as the opers/admins abuses t...

that manangers sharing usernames.. that one channel got 2 "owners" or one user got "2 channels" who cares about that? look at #skype as an example.. i've heard about cservice admins who got 500 on more than one channel.. and even more than 2.. and so on... i do know about the old...

Quakenet got maxlogins 2, no problem there.. they are actually much better than undernet to keep away "abusive things".
Other networks as well got ghost kill and such things.. can't see why we should spare the maxlogins.. i belive it will decrease the amount of mulitple usernames to...