|
It is currently Mon Dec 16, 2019 12:21 pm
|
View unanswered posts | View active topics
 |
|
 |
|
Author |
Message |
Crys
|
Post subject: Re: HISTORY or Manager/Admin Log  Posted: Sat Aug 08, 2009 1:00 pm |
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 4:35 pm Posts: 27 Location: Undernet
|
Panzer wrote: Correct Eenie, redirecting not via a notice but implicit to the website to visualize the whole list (access levels, number of bans for instance). The same would apply I presume for the results of the history log, making necessary the access on the website. Do you know/could you imagine how hard it could be to create a cookie between X and the Channel Service Website? If you want to be automatically redirected, as in X to give you the COMPLETE link where you can see the rest of the matches, well, as far as I am concerned, you are just giving the coders some extra quite exhausting work and probably useless. This way they have to create a cookie "manager" or something that actually saves the session and allows you to access the section within a period of time. Anyway, X and the Website are two different things, they work together but they should not be strictly together because there could be security branches, which are not such a wise idea.
_________________ Just a wise head on young shoulders.
|
|
|
|
 |
Eenie
|
Post subject: Re: HISTORY or Manager/Admin Log  Posted: Sat Aug 08, 2009 8:35 pm |
Forum Super Moderator |
 |
Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2002 1:00 am Posts: 606 Location: Virginia, USA
|
Crys wrote: Panzer wrote: Correct Eenie, redirecting not via a notice but implicit to the website to visualize the whole list (access levels, number of bans for instance). The same would apply I presume for the results of the history log, making necessary the access on the website. Do you know/could you imagine how hard it could be to create a cookie between X and the Channel Service Website? If you want to be automatically redirected, as in X to give you the COMPLETE link where you can see the rest of the matches, well, as far as I am concerned, you are just giving the coders some extra quite exhausting work and probably useless. This way they have to create a cookie "manager" or something that actually saves the session and allows you to access the section within a period of time. Anyway, X and the Website are two different things, they work together but they should not be strictly together because there could be security branches, which are not such a wise idea. Crys,
You misunderstood. I was merely suggesting that X give the same results as it does now, and also include the URL to the website, including a message such as: "For more information, go to http://cservice.undernet.org/live/ and log in. Then click on the Channel Info link on the left to see the complete list of channel accesses."
As it stands now, X gives you the 15, then in two separate lines, states: "-X- There are more than 15 matching entries" and "-X- Please restrict your query."
I don't think any "coding" is necessary. Just adding the above line to "Please restrict your query."
I believe you read way too much into my suggestion. Unless, of course, you are talking to Panzer. I never understood his reply, so maybe that is the case. 
~Eenie
_________________ Just a small fish in a big sea 
|
|
|
|
 |
Crys
|
Post subject: Re: HISTORY or Manager/Admin Log  Posted: Sat Aug 08, 2009 10:50 pm |
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 4:35 pm Posts: 27 Location: Undernet
|
Yeah. Was thinking on what Panzer said, thought you were referring at the same thing.
_________________ Just a wise head on young shoulders.
|
|
|
|
 |
Panzer
|
Post subject: Re: HISTORY or Manager/Admin Log  Posted: Sun Aug 09, 2009 4:40 pm |
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2008 2:46 pm Posts: 40 Location: West
|
Crys wrote: Do you know/could you imagine how hard it could be to create a cookie between X and the Channel Service Website? If you want to be automatically redirected, as in X to give you the COMPLETE link where you can see the rest of the matches, well, as far as I am concerned, you are just giving the coders some extra quite exhausting work and probably useless. This way they have to create a cookie "manager" or something that actually saves the session and allows you to access the section within a period of time. Anyway, X and the Website are two different things, they work together but they should not be strictly together because there could be security branches, which are not such a wise idea. You probably failed to understand that both Eenie and I were reffering to a standard default message that redirects people to the website in order to find out more details on 15(10) max replies on X command. Furthermore it's being taken into consideration as I understood to be implemented alongside and allow users to know the website (and it's link) gives out the entire feedback on inquiry. And no, it's not an exhaustive task, don't worry.
_________________
|
|
|
|
 |
Crys
|
Post subject: Re: HISTORY or Manager/Admin Log  Posted: Sun Aug 09, 2009 5:35 pm |
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 4:35 pm Posts: 27 Location: Undernet
|
Panzer wrote: Correct Eenie, redirecting not via a notice but implicit to the website to visualize the whole list (access levels, number of bans for instance). The same would apply I presume for the results of the history log, making necessary the access on the website. From the BOLDed part I understand that you want X to give you a reply such as: -X- There are more than 15 matching entries. -X- Please access http://cservice.undernet.org/live/link_ ... hp?cookies for the entire list. That's how I got it. Now I understand that you want X to say something like this: -X- There are more than 15 matching entries. -X- Please access http://cservice.undernet.org/live/, login, and click on Channel Information (adding the channel name) to see the entire list. Eenie was confused too. So I didn't "fail" to do anything 
_________________ Just a wise head on young shoulders.
|
|
|
|
 |
Crys
|
Post subject: Re: HISTORY or Manager/Admin Log  Posted: Sun Aug 09, 2009 5:38 pm |
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 4:35 pm Posts: 27 Location: Undernet
|
Furthermore, I don't think this is the right place to discuss it, a suggesion should be placed where it's supposed to be, I think we should concentrate ourselves on the new feature which is going to be released pretty soon.
_________________ Just a wise head on young shoulders.
|
|
|
|
 |
toolz
|
Post subject: Re: HISTORY or Manager/Admin Log  Posted: Sun Aug 16, 2009 10:47 pm |
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 3:05 pm Posts: 65 Location: Romania, Craiova
|
There are 9460 users and 73115 invisible on 31 servers - right now on Undernet (I know that drones and bots won't join the forum to vote but maybe half of them are real people which most do not join the forum)
There are 129 votes and few debates about the subject.
I wonder how much time will this thread requier to achieve something important to be casted as a real vote.
These votes were sent by people who usually know each other from frequent channels (usually help channels) as they (we) are the most active on forum aswell.
So, only them voting does NOT count for the other thousands of users who have no clue about this poll or any other modification which is about to take place (in progress). (let them know that you're willing to do some modifications and you are asking about their opinion, a global notice, something, I don't know - that if you haven't done it already)
This goes to all other polls which have been opened or any other new poll which will be opened.
Some might consider this offtopic, not my intention but thats how I think about the polls from Undernet's forum.
|
|
|
|
 |
Spidel
|
Post subject: Re: HISTORY or Manager/Admin Log  Posted: Mon Aug 17, 2009 6:24 am |
Joined: Sun Aug 01, 2004 9:22 pm Posts: 639 Location: Backyard
|
toolz wrote: There are 9460 users and 73115 invisible on 31 servers - right now on Undernet (I know that drones and bots won't join the forum to vote but maybe half of them are real people which most do not join the forum)
There are 129 votes and few debates about the subject.
I wonder how much time will this thread requier to achieve something important to be casted as a real vote.
These votes were sent by people who usually know each other from frequent channels (usually help channels) as they (we) are the most active on forum aswell.
So, only them voting does NOT count for the other thousands of users who have no clue about this poll or any other modification which is about to take place (in progress). (let them know that you're willing to do some modifications and you are asking about their opinion, a global notice, something, I don't know - that if you haven't done it already)
This goes to all other polls which have been opened or any other new poll which will be opened.
Some might consider this offtopic, not my intention but thats how I think about the polls from Undernet's forum. LOL, all registered users to undernet forum can vote. Still those who are unregistered here and know about forum existence, can see the thread and if they wanna vote they will register or/and respond to thread with their suggestion/idea/opinion or whatever. And i believe the vote session come to an end. You can no longer vote P.S: I'd like to thank Simba for the new design of undernet forum, it looks way better than before. 
_________________ "A wise man writes down what he thinks, a stupid man forgets what he thinks, a complete idiot punishes himself for what he thinks."
|
|
|
|
 |
xplora
|
Post subject: Re: HISTORY or Manager/Admin Log  Posted: Mon Aug 17, 2009 12:19 pm |
Senior Cservice Admin |
 |
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2003 2:47 am Posts: 564 Location: Hamilton, New Zealand
|
I'm an idiot, I forgot to include simple Yes/No options... anyway, this feature is now in the hands of the Undernet Admins.
Topic Locked, I will post their decision once I know it.
_________________ xplora @ undernet.org Past Co-ordinator Undernet Channel Services Committee
|
|
|
|
 |
xplora
|
Post subject: STATUS Update...  Posted: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:18 pm |
Senior Cservice Admin |
 |
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2003 2:47 am Posts: 564 Location: Hamilton, New Zealand
|
Basically this feature has privacy issues (let alone storage issues), in short, The Undernet Admins have seen the idea, barely discussed it, and basically chosen not to put it to a vote, which essentially kills this idea completely.
_________________ xplora @ undernet.org Past Co-ordinator Undernet Channel Services Committee
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|