It is currently Fri Sep 22, 2017 4:26 pm




 Page 1 of 1 [ 10 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 04, 2002 4:04 am 

Joined: Thu Oct 03, 2002 1:00 am
Posts: 3
This is similar to what what Quakenet uses ( http://www.quakenet.org ). They have 2 channel bots, Q and L. L stands for "lightweight", which is a basic version of Q, it has far less features than Q and is intended for small channels with only a few users. I think this is what Undernet needs. I have a small channel that me and a few friends go to (only 5 of us in total) and it's impossible to get X there. If there was a separate bot from X (resurrect W! :grin: ) that was for smaller channels it would be perfect. You would only need 3-5 usernames to register a channel with it, and it would have only a few basic commands, like OP DEOP BAN UNBAN, etc... so it would use less resources than X. Does anyone think this is a good idea, or does it completely suck?


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 02, 2002 10:13 pm 

Joined: Sun Dec 01, 2002 1:43 pm
Posts: 7
Location: UAE, Dubai
Hey folks,
well in my opinion ONE bot is enough! having a bot for a channel with a small group of users! then what is the point if it would be so, then there would be ALOT of new channels with the new bot you are talking about, which actually will be there for nothing, for me i join undernet servers to meet New users and my friends,,if users would be able to form a new channels with sucha small number of users that easy, later on they will start making inviting wars on the big channels! and here we go we have new lamers around.
my point is we dont want more empty channels on undernet.
Thanks :lol:



_________________
NiSwAnJi
Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 07, 2002 7:34 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 31, 2002 1:00 am
Posts: 73
Location: Italy
Your mail has 2 points : new bot and the purpose of this new bot.
1- The new bot: to put it up you would need MORE resources than using ONLY the X. It's mathematics: two bots 'eat' more than one. It doesn't matter that the second is a 'smaller' bot.
2- The purpose: setting a seccond class of channels of the kind you suggested means only more problems. Channels with few users means only unstable channels. CService setted a 10 supporters rule for making the channel more stronger and more stable. And if you want friendly channels, unstable ones to chat with friends only... I don't know... once a week or once a month you will find more useful to just invent a channel set it private and invite only so no one will disturb you.... the choice is yours.
8)



_________________

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GCM d-- s+:- a- C++ UL P+ L++ E W++ N+ o-- K- w
O- M V PS+++ PE Y+ PGP t 5 X+ R tv-- b++ DI++ D+
G e++ h r- y+
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2003 1:40 am 

Joined: Fri Jan 03, 2003 12:56 am
Posts: 3
Actually, just because you have a channel with *most of the time* has only < 10 users does not mean it's a channel you have *just for friends once a week or once a month*. That's absurd!

The idea of a 'light' bot, which is 'easier to obtain' than X is by far a good idea.....but it's not the ways of Undernet and never has been so I would imagine it won't be any different than what it is now.

However, it could be good to bring back W to be this bot ;)


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: channel bot
PostPosted: Thu Apr 10, 2003 1:46 pm 

Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2003 11:25 pm
Posts: 1
undernet is unique and wil remain unique.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: hey
PostPosted: Thu Apr 10, 2003 2:44 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2003 10:01 pm
Posts: 28
Location: Belgium
Well, i don't think this is a good idea...

You're talking about small channels... with 4-6 users. So you need only 3 supporters, who can ensure that this channel will always have 4-6 users, and that it won't grow?

Think this "suggestion" is impossible to take care of, too many problems will come out of this.



_________________
Greetz,

Name: Davy S.
Nickname: []DARK[]
Username: DARKm
E-mail: dark@undernet.org
Position: CService Official Administrator
Organisation: Undernet Channel Service Committee
Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: W
PostPosted: Wed Jun 22, 2005 7:02 am 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2004 9:31 am
Posts: 35
Location: Argentina Buenos Aires
IDEA : compile again to W and X :)

regrads.

morf


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 24, 2005 9:52 am 
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 23, 2004 7:43 pm
Posts: 323
Location: Nowhere
Ressurecting VERY old posts just won`t do it ;P



_________________
I'm an angel, honest! The horns are just there to keep the halo straight
Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 28, 2006 4:05 pm 

Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2006 11:22 am
Posts: 19
somedood

You see , you sayd you want a channel for you an a few friends (5) . You don`t need X for that , just wait a bit `till the new modes for channels will be activated , and you`ll can be the mngr of a channel without having a bot at all . and you`ll can deop an op your self when ever you want .
Read this for more info -> http://www.srvx.net/ircu2_10_12-user-guide.html , maybe this will guide you better to understand the problem :)


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 06, 2006 9:49 pm 
Newsletter Editor
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 07, 2002 1:00 am
Posts: 52
Location: Canada
Why would anyone reply to a 2002 post in the first place? Anyway, just let it go! X is enough, we don't need another service like W. If you can't get it on your channel, look around for a bot lending channel.



_________________
Mathieu Patry
patry@user-com.undernet.org
Undernet User Committee Representative
Offline
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
 Page 1 of 1 [ 10 posts ] 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: